Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MOYLE v. LIBERTY MUTUAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN, 10cv2179-GPC(MDD). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161017a71 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GONZALO P. CURIEL , District Judge . The court held a status conference on September 6, 2016 after the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate affirming in part and reversing in part the Court's order on summary judgment and remanding the case. (Dkt. No. 282.) Prior to setting the matter for trial, Defendants request that the Court address the statute of limitations issue that was not addressed by
More

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The court held a status conference on September 6, 2016 after the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate affirming in part and reversing in part the Court's order on summary judgment and remanding the case. (Dkt. No. 282.) Prior to setting the matter for trial, Defendants request that the Court address the statute of limitations issue that was not addressed by this Court or the Ninth Circuit as it relates to the remaining claim under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3).

In light of the Court's ruling on Defendants' motion for summary judgment, the Court did not address Defendants' argument on statute of limitations concerning the cause of action under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). (Dkt. No. 252 at 26 n.9.) The Ninth Circuit also declined to address Defendants' argument on this issue and commented that the "district court may consider such arguments on remand." Moyle v. Liberty Mut. Retirement Benefit Plan, ___ F.3d ___, 2016 WL 4394583, at *8 n.5 (9th Cir. 2016).

The Court finds it appropriate to consider the statute of limitations issue that might bar the claims under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a supplemental brief, no longer than 10 pages, to address any recent developments in the law on or before October 28, 2016. Plaintiffs shall file an opposition, no longer than 10 pages, on or before November 10, 2016. Defendants shall file a reply of no longer than 5 pages on or before November 18, 2016. A hearing is set on December 16, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2D.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer