BLAIR v. METRONIC, 3:15-cv-01678-JD. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161018a47
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 53. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 45 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no cer
Summary: ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 53. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 45 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no cert..
More
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 53. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 45 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no certification is filed, the dismissal will be deemed to be with prejudice after 45 days.
The parties are directed not to ask the Court for a "dismissal with prejudice" at any time after this order, or to ask for an order confirming dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1). No Court order is necessary for dismissal under that rule.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
