ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Re: Dkt. No. 19

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison officials at San Francisco County Jail violated his constitutional rights. On August 16, 2016, Defendants informed the Court that they had been unable to reach Plaintiff because he had been released from the custody of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department on May 10, 2016, but had not provided the Court or Defendants with notice of his new address. Docket No. 15. Defendants requested an extension of time to file their dispositive motion, stating that they need to depose Plaintiff in order to file a dispositive motion but had been unable to contact Plaintiff. Id.

On August 18, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to comply with Civil Local Rule 3-11 and notify the Court and all parties of his new address. Docket No. 16. The Court stayed all deadlines pending Plaintiff's compliance with Rule 3-11. Id. On October 4, 2016, Plaintiff informed the Court of his new address via phone. On October 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address with the Court and requested an extension of time to comply with court orders. Docket No. 19. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is DENIED AS MOOT. There are no Court orders requiring Plaintiff's response.

The Court sets the following briefing schedule. By December 19, 2016, Defendants must file and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Plaintiff's opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served upon defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed.

This order terminates Docket No. 19.

IT IS SO ORDERED.