ROMERO v. ELLERY, 12-cv-01084-WHO. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161020b28
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 101 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, agreed to settlement in full of this matter at Settlement Conference conducted September 8, 2016. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within forty-five (45) days fro
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 101 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, agreed to settlement in full of this matter at Settlement Conference conducted September 8, 2016. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within forty-five (45) days from..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 101
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, agreed to settlement in full of this matter at Settlement Conference conducted September 8, 2016.
IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within forty-five (45) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
