STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS:

1. Defendants City of New York, Michael Merrill, Maltiben Chudavala and Michael Kotlyar ("City defendants") filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on September 12, 2016.

2. Plaintiff Chauncey Mahan ("Plaintiff") filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the City defendants' motion on October 3, 2016.

3. The City defendants did not file an opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, and on October 5, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff's request, providing him with an extension until October 17, 2016 to file his opposition to City defendants' motion. Plaintiff then filed his opposition on October 17, 2016.

4. Based on the October 17, 2016 filing date, in accordance with Local Rule 7-3, the City defendants' new deadline for their reply brief is October 24.

5. While the City defendants' have attempted to complete their reply brief by the October 24 deadline, counsel for the City defendants has informed Plaintiff that both the City of New York's Office of Corporation Counsel and outside counsel for defendants had prior commitments scheduled during the week preceding this new October 24 deadline and, accordingly, necessitate a one-week extension of time in order to complete their reply, i.e., until October 31, 2016.

6. Plaintiff has courteously agreed to the City defendants' requested extension.

7. The hearing on City defendants' motion is currently set for November 3, 2016. (The parties defer to the Court regarding whether additional time is needed for a disposition on City defendants' motion.)

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the City of New York Michael Merrill, Maltiben Chudavala and Michael Kotlyar's reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss shall be due on October 31, 2016.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.