Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Federal Trade Commission v. DIRECTV, 3:15-cv-01129 HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161025e23 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR REBUTTAL REPORT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC (DIRECTV) jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-12, to extend the time for DIRECTV to serve its rebuttal report to the expert report of Tulin Erdem. Due to scheduling issues, DIRECTV is taking the deposition of Ms. Erdem on November 4, 2016, which is after the currently-scheduled Octob
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR REBUTTAL REPORT

Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC (DIRECTV) jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-12, to extend the time for DIRECTV to serve its rebuttal report to the expert report of Tulin Erdem.

Due to scheduling issues, DIRECTV is taking the deposition of Ms. Erdem on November 4, 2016, which is after the currently-scheduled October 21 deadline for DIRECTV to serve its rebuttal report. The parties have conferred with each other and Ms. Erdem about scheduling and have arrived at an agreement satisfactory to all, which includes extending DIRECTV's time to serve a rebuttal report to November 7 and the FTC's time to serve a reply report to November 28. The proposed modification to the schedule would have no effect on any other deadlines in this case (i.e., all other rebuttal report deadlines remain the same, all other reply report deadlines remain the same, and the expert discovery cut-off date remains the same).

There have been the following modifications to the schedule in this case: (a) Dkt. No. 23, April 17, 2015 (granting stipulated request for an extension of time for the FTC to file motion to strike Defendants' affirmative defenses); (b) Dkt. No. 64, October 21, 2015 (granting motion for extension of time for the FTC to respond to DIRECTV's motion for partial summary judgment); (c) Dkt. No. 87, December 9, 2015 (granting joint stipulation to extend DIRECTV's time to file its reply brief in support of its motion for partial summary judgment, and continuing hearing date on motion for partial summary judgment); (d) Dkt. No. 99, February 4, 2016 (granting stipulation continuing hearing date on motion for partial summary judgment); (e) Dkt. No. 105 (granting stipulation continuing Case Management Conference); (f) Dkt. No. 138, April 12, 2016 (granting stipulation to extend case deadlines, including fact and expert discovery, summary judgment briefing deadlines and hearing date, and trial date); (g) Dkt. No. 159, July 19, 2016 (granting stipulation to extend case deadlines, including fact and expert discovery); (h) Dkt. 181, September 26, 2016 (granting motion to extend time to file declaration in support of motion to file under seal); and (i) September 28, 2016 (granting stipulation to extend time for rebuttal and reply expert reports and expert discovery).

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through thee undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the court enter the following schedule:

Event Current Date Proposed Date Rebuttal Report to October 21, 2016 November 7 Erdem Report Reply Report November 14, 2016 November 28, 2016 Expert Discovery Close December 2, 2016 December 2, 2016

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that cooncurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories above.

ORDEER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer