ROBINSON v. THE CHEFS' WAREHOUSE, 15-cv-05421-RS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161027c11
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY MOTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery responses filed this date (Dkt. No. 28) is denied for failure to comply with the procedures for presenting discovery disputes set out in the Case Management Scheduling Order, filed March 24, 2016 (Dkt. No. 20). This order is without prejudice to plaintiff's ability to resubmit the dispute in the manner specified in the Case Management Scheduling Order, at which
Summary: ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY MOTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery responses filed this date (Dkt. No. 28) is denied for failure to comply with the procedures for presenting discovery disputes set out in the Case Management Scheduling Order, filed March 24, 2016 (Dkt. No. 20). This order is without prejudice to plaintiff's ability to resubmit the dispute in the manner specified in the Case Management Scheduling Order, at which ..
More
ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY MOTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery responses filed this date (Dkt. No. 28) is denied for failure to comply with the procedures for presenting discovery disputes set out in the Case Management Scheduling Order, filed March 24, 2016 (Dkt. No. 20). This order is without prejudice to plaintiff's ability to resubmit the dispute in the manner specified in the Case Management Scheduling Order, at which time the merits of the dispute will be referred to a magistrate judge for resolution.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
