Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

O'HANLON v. 24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., 5:15-cv-01821-BLF. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161103h07 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Michele O'Hanlon ("Plaintiff") and 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., hereby stipulate and request an order dismissing this case in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The claims alleged on behalf of Plaintiff as an individual will be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED. E-FILER'S ATTESTATION I obtained the concurr
More

STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Michele O'Hanlon ("Plaintiff") and 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., hereby stipulate and request an order dismissing this case in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The claims alleged on behalf of Plaintiff as an individual will be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

E-FILER'S ATTESTATION

I obtained the concurrence of Ms. Kirkpatrick to file the foregoing.

/s/Aaron D. Radbil Aaron D. Radbil

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer