Fagundes v. Colvin, 3:16-03462-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161109c90
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of 90 days to file his Motion for Summary Judgment in response to Defendant's Answer. The new due date for filing Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be February 20, 2017. This extension is necessar
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of 90 days to file his Motion for Summary Judgment in response to Defendant's Answer. The new due date for filing Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be February 20, 2017. This extension is necessary..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of 90 days to file his Motion for Summary Judgment in response to Defendant's Answer. The new due date for filing Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be February 20, 2017.
This extension is necessary for Plaintiff to find an attorney to represent him in this matter. Plaintiff Pro Se sincerely apologizes to the Court and to Defendant for any inconvenience caused by this delay. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER:
PAPPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
