Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Swearingen v. Late July Snacks LLC, 13-cv-4324-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161114i00 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Subject to the Court's approval, the parties stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on October 31, 2016, Late July filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended complaint in this action, which set February 16, 2017 as the date for hearing the motion; WHEREAS, on October 31, 2016, Healthy Beverage, LLC filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amende
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Subject to the Court's approval, the parties stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2016, Late July filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended complaint in this action, which set February 16, 2017 as the date for hearing the motion;

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2016, Healthy Beverage, LLC filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended complaint, also setting a hearing date of February 16, 2017, in the action captioned Swearingen et al v. Healthy Beverage, LLC, 13-cv-04385, which is also pending before this Court, asserts claims relating to the use of "evaporated cane juice," and is currently on the same schedule as this action;

WHEREAS, a CMC is currently scheduled for November 18, 2016 in both this matter and the Healthy Beverage matter; and

WHEREAS, the parties to this action and the Healthy Beverage action have all conferred and agree that conducting the CMCs prior to the completion of briefing and a hearing on the motions to dismiss is unlikely to advance these matters or to be an efficient use of the Court's or the parties' resources;

The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows:

1. Adjourning the November 18, 2016 CMC until February 16, 2017, or a date thereafter that is convenient for the Court; 2. Setting a deadline of December 16, 2016 for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to the motion to dismiss; and 3. Setting a deadline of January 16, 2017 for Late July to file its reply in response to Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion to dismiss.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer