U.S. v. SINGLETON, CR 14-0441 CRB. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161114i06
Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION TO VACATE RESTITUTION HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , Senior District Judge . The parties move to vacate the November 2, 2016 restitution hearing. Defendant has executed a settlement agreement with the final victim company, such that a hearing is no longer necessary. SO STIPULATED. [PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' stipulated motion to vacate the restitution in the above-captioned matter.
STIPULATED MOTION TO VACATE RESTITUTION HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, Senior District Judge.
The parties move to vacate the November 2, 2016 restitution hearing. Defendant has executed a settlement agreement with the final victim company, such that a hearing is no longer necessary.
SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' stipulated motion to vacate the restitution in the above-captioned matter.
Source: Leagle
