Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AFT Local 2121 v. Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, 3:16-cv-03411-HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161114l72 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT ACCJC'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Defendant Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges ("ACCJC") and Plaintiffs AFT Local 2121; Palomar Faculty Federation, AFT Local 6161, Mendocino College Federation of Teachers, AFT Local 6322,
More

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF BRIEFS ON DEFENDANT ACCJC'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Defendant Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges ("ACCJC") and Plaintiffs AFT Local 2121; Palomar Faculty Federation, AFT Local 6161, Mendocino College Federation of Teachers, AFT Local 6322, San Jose-Evergreen Federation of Teachers, AFT Local 6157, California Federation of Teachers, Alisa Messer, Tim Killikelly, Karen Saginor, Shannon Lienhart, Shanell Williiams, and Augusta Goldstein ("Plaintiffs") respectfully stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint in this action on November 4, 2016 (D.I. 57, the "SAC");

WHEREAS, Defendant ACCJC currently has up to and including December 5, 2016 to answer, move, and/or otherwise respond to the SAC;

WHEREAS, the SAC is voluminous, asserting seven separate causes of action and including 326 numbered paragraphs on 76 pages;

WHEREAS, Defendant has indicated that it will move to dismiss all seven causes of action in the SAC;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, and through their respective attorneys of record and subject to order of the Court, as follows:

(1) ACCJC may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in support of a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (2) Plaintiffs may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in opposition to ACCJC's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (3) ACCJC may file a reply memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 20 pages in further support of its motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THORUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i) ATTESTATION

I, Kenneth E. Keller, hereby attest that I have been authorized by Eileen B. Goldsmith, counsel for Plaintiffs, to execute on her behalf this Joint Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of Briefs on Defendant ACCJC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint.

Dated: November 8, 2016 /s/ Kenneth E. Keller Kenneth E. Keller

[PROPOSED] ORDER

As stipulated and agreed to by the Parties, ACCJC may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in support of a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint; Plaintiffs may file a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 30 pages in opposition to ACCJC's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint; and ACCJC may file a reply memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 20 pages in further support of its motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer