BRUZZONE v. INTEL CORPORATION, C 14-01279 WHA (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161121773
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW OF COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed plaintiff Michael Bruzzone's new complaint in Bruzzone v. Intel Corp., No. 3:16-mc-80233-WHA (Dkt. No. 1), and finds its contents are frivolous or duplicative of past filings in plaintiff's prolonged series of lawsuits against Intel. Accordingly, pursuant to the pre-filing review order issued on August 19, 2014, in Bruzzone v. Intel Corp., No. 3:14-cv-01279-WHA (Dkt. No. 88), the Clerk is dir
Summary: ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW OF COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed plaintiff Michael Bruzzone's new complaint in Bruzzone v. Intel Corp., No. 3:16-mc-80233-WHA (Dkt. No. 1), and finds its contents are frivolous or duplicative of past filings in plaintiff's prolonged series of lawsuits against Intel. Accordingly, pursuant to the pre-filing review order issued on August 19, 2014, in Bruzzone v. Intel Corp., No. 3:14-cv-01279-WHA (Dkt. No. 88), the Clerk is dire..
More
ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW OF COMPLAINT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed plaintiff Michael Bruzzone's new complaint in Bruzzone v. Intel Corp., No. 3:16-mc-80233-WHA (Dkt. No. 1), and finds its contents are frivolous or duplicative of past filings in plaintiff's prolonged series of lawsuits against Intel. Accordingly, pursuant to the pre-filing review order issued on August 19, 2014, in Bruzzone v. Intel Corp., No. 3:14-cv-01279-WHA (Dkt. No. 88), the Clerk is directed not to accept the new complaint for filing. Plaintiff's concurrent application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall please CLOSE THE FILE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
