Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc., 3:15-CV-04525-EMC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161122951
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO GRANT ACCESS TO SEALED TRANSCRIPT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. ("Avago") and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively, "ASUS") hereby move the Court for an order directing the Court Reporter to provide to counsel of record in this action copies of the sealed transcript of the proceedings held on October
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO GRANT ACCESS TO SEALED TRANSCRIPT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. ("Avago") and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively, "ASUS") hereby move the Court for an order directing the Court Reporter to provide to counsel of record in this action copies of the sealed transcript of the proceedings held on October 2..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO GRANT ACCESS TO SEALED TRANSCRIPT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. ("Avago") and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively, "ASUS") hereby move the Court for an order directing the Court Reporter to provide to counsel of record in this action copies of the sealed transcript of the proceedings held on October 28, 2016. The Court sealed the transcript at the request of the parties. The Court Reporter has informed counsel for Avago that a Court order is required for the parties to access the transcript. The transcript may be helpful to the parties in further proceedings in this litigation. Further, once access is granted, the parties will be able to identify those portions that need to be sealed and allow the remaining portions to be unsealed. No party will be prejudiced by granting access to counsel of record, all of whom are bound by the Protective Order in this action.
Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to the relief requested herein, and respectfully request that the Court enter an order directing the Court Reporter to provide the sealed transcript to counsel of record in this action.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
