ALEXANDER v. PAUL BLANCO'S GOOD CAR COMPANY OF OAKLAND, 16-cv-03553-MEJ. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161123c53
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2016
Summary: CONDITIIONAL DISMISSAL MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be resto
Summary: CONDITIIONAL DISMISSAL MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restor..
More
CONDITIIONAL DISMISSAL
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed after passage of ninety (90) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
