Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Benton v. Clarity Services, Inc., 3:16-cv-06583-MMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161123c56 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and by and through their counsel, Plaintiff Joyce Benton ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. ("Clarity") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby agree to the following briefing schedule and seek an Order from the Court confirming same: Clarity shall have until December 12, 2016 to
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and by and through their counsel, Plaintiff Joyce Benton ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. ("Clarity") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby agree to the following briefing schedule and seek an Order from the Court confirming same:

Clarity shall have until December 12, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

If Clarity files a responsive pleading other than an Answer, Plaintiff shall have until January 9, 2017 to file an opposition to Clarity's Motion, and Clarity shall have until January 16, 2017 to file a reply.

This Stipulation is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to seek a remand of the action, which shall be due on December 14, 2016. If Plaintiff files a Motion to Remand the action, Clarity's opposition shall be filed on January 6, 2017, and Plaintiff's reply shall be filed on January 13, 2017.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer