Sampson v. Ukiah Valley Medical Center, 15-cv-00160-WHO. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161123c70
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED EXTENSION OF PLAINTIFFS DEADLINE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS' DR. MARKS' AND PACIFIC REDWOOD MEDICAL GROUP'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAME. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiffs DR. ALAN SAMPSON MD & KATHY SAMPSON on behalf of the ESTATE OF ANDREW SAMPSON and Defendants DEBBIE L MARKS, MD and PACIFIC REDWOOD MEDICAL GROUP, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows. 1. Plaintiffs have requested the hearing on Defen
Summary: STIPULATED EXTENSION OF PLAINTIFFS DEADLINE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS' DR. MARKS' AND PACIFIC REDWOOD MEDICAL GROUP'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAME. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiffs DR. ALAN SAMPSON MD & KATHY SAMPSON on behalf of the ESTATE OF ANDREW SAMPSON and Defendants DEBBIE L MARKS, MD and PACIFIC REDWOOD MEDICAL GROUP, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows. 1. Plaintiffs have requested the hearing on Defend..
More
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF PLAINTIFFS DEADLINE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS' DR. MARKS' AND PACIFIC REDWOOD MEDICAL GROUP'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAME.
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs DR. ALAN SAMPSON MD & KATHY SAMPSON on behalf of the ESTATE OF ANDREW SAMPSON and Defendants DEBBIE L MARKS, MD and PACIFIC REDWOOD MEDICAL GROUP, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows.
1. Plaintiffs have requested the hearing on Defendants' Dr. Marks' and Pacific Redwood Medical Group's motion for summary judgment be continued from January 11, 2017 until February 1, 2017. Plaintiffs' counsel currently has a trial set for January 9th, 2017 in Santa Clara, County which conflicts with the date for which the motion was originally set.
2. Plaintiffs have further requested their deadline to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgement also be extended. Plaintiffs require the opportunity to depose Dr. Marks and the FRCP 30(b)(6) representative of Pacific Redwood Medical Group in order to allow their experts to provide the fullest and most accurate affidavits in support of Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' Dr. Marks' and Pacific Redwood Medical Group's motion for summary judgment. Defendants Dr. Marks and Pacific Redwood Medical Group have agreed to allow Plaintiffs to file their opposition fourteen calendar days from the completion of the depositions of Dr. Marks and the FRCP 30(b)(6) representative of Pacific Redwood Medical Group.
3. The Parties have set the depositions for December 7th and 16th. Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment will accordingly be due by December 30, 2016.
4. Defendants' reply to plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment will be due by January 11, 2017.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
1. Defendants' Dr. Marks' and Pacific Redwood Medical Group's motion for summary judgment is continued from January 11, 2017 until February 1, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
2. Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment will be due by December 30, 2016.
3. Defendants' reply to plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment will be due by January 11, 2017.
ORDER
1. Having considered the stipulation of the above signing parties the court grants the stipulation as follows:
2. Hearing on Defendant Marks' and PRMG's motion for Summary Judgment is continued until February 1, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
3. Plaintiffs' deadline to file their opposition to Defendant Marks' and PRMG's motion for Summary Judgment is extended until December 30, 2016.
4. Defendant Marks' and PRMG's deadline to file their reply brief is extended until January 11, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
