Meiri v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, 3:16-cv-00103-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161123c78
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN HEARING DATE; ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . By and through their counsel of record, Plaintiff Hadar Meiri ("Meiri") and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ("Hartford") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court permit a continuance of the following briefing schedule deadline and corresponding change in the hearing date. Good cause exists as follows: Whe
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN HEARING DATE; ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . By and through their counsel of record, Plaintiff Hadar Meiri ("Meiri") and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ("Hartford") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court permit a continuance of the following briefing schedule deadline and corresponding change in the hearing date. Good cause exists as follows: Wher..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN HEARING DATE; ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
By and through their counsel of record, Plaintiff Hadar Meiri ("Meiri") and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ("Hartford") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court permit a continuance of the following briefing schedule deadline and corresponding change in the hearing date. Good cause exists as follows:
Whereas in this ERISA case, the Court set a briefing schedule for the parties' respective cross-Motions for Judgment under FRCP Rule 52. (Doc 19) Plaintiff Meiri filed her Motion for Judgment on October 19, 2016. Defendant Hartford filed its Motion for Judgment on November 9, 2016.
Whereas Rebecca Grey, Attorney for Plaintiff Meiri, required medical leave and rehabilitation following major surgery in late October; the limited hours available by legal staff; and conflicts arising from the winter holidays have created an administrative hardship.
Whereas the parties have met and conferred and propose the following new briefing schedule to accommodate these unavoidable issues:
• Plaintiff's responsive brief, currently due November 30, 2016, shall be extended to January 5, 2017.
• Defendant's responsive brief, currently due December 21, 2016, shall be extended to February 2, 2017.
• The parties request that the Motion hearing date and time on this matter, currently set for January 12, 2017 at 2:00 pm, be moved to February 16, 2017 at 2:00 pm.
No prior continuances have been requested.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
