MEYER v. COLVIN, 3:16-cv-01894-RS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161123c80
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Michael Thomas Meyer (Plaintiff) and Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant or the Commissioner), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket Number 20). The current deadline is November 11, 2016, and the new
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Michael Thomas Meyer (Plaintiff) and Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant or the Commissioner), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket Number 20). The current deadline is November 11, 2016, and the new d..
More
ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RICHARD SEEBORG, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Michael Thomas Meyer (Plaintiff) and Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant or the Commissioner), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket Number 20). The current deadline is November 11, 2016, and the new deadline would be December 12, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time and the third extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter. Defendant requests this additional time due unanticipated leave and the undersigned workload, which includes 14 dispositive briefs in the month of November 2016. Defense counsel apologizes for any inconvenience as to the timing of this request. While defense counsel provided a copy of her request for an extension of time to chambers on November 10, 2016, she inadvertently failed to file the document with the Court. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
ORDER
Good cause appearing, pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall respond to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before December 12, 2016.
Source: Leagle
