Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RYAN v. COLVIN, 3:16-cv-3410-RS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161128903 Visitors: 33
Filed: Nov. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 23, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendant moves, through her counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended to December 29, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because additional time is needed to respond to the motion due to undersigned counsel's workload. In particu
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendant moves, through her counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended to December 29, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because additional time is needed to respond to the motion due to undersigned counsel's workload. In particular, Defendant's counsel has three other other district court briefs due before by November 30, 2016.

With this extension, the Court's scheduling order would be modified as follows:

• Plaintiff may serve and file a reply within fourteen days of service of defendant's opposition or counter-motion (on or before January 12, 2016).

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer