Filed: Nov. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 90 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On November 4, 2016, Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 88.) In contravention of Civil Local Rule 5-1 and this Court's Standing Order, Defendants failed to provide a chambers copy of their filing. On November 18, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring a chambers copy to be delivered to the Court by November 21, 2016. 1 (Dkt. No. 90.) Defendants again failed t
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 90 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On November 4, 2016, Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 88.) In contravention of Civil Local Rule 5-1 and this Court's Standing Order, Defendants failed to provide a chambers copy of their filing. On November 18, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring a chambers copy to be delivered to the Court by November 21, 2016. 1 (Dkt. No. 90.) Defendants again failed to..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 90
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 4, 2016, Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 88.) In contravention of Civil Local Rule 5-1 and this Court's Standing Order, Defendants failed to provide a chambers copy of their filing. On November 18, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring a chambers copy to be delivered to the Court by November 21, 2016.1 (Dkt. No. 90.) Defendants again failed to comply.
Accordingly, Defendants' counsel is ordered to provide a chambers copy and to show cause, by November 30, 2016, why they should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the Court's November 18, 2016 order under the Court's inherent authority. See Network Caching Tech., LLC v. Novell, Inc., No. C-01-2079 VRW, 2003 WL 21699799, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2003) ("there is no question the court may, again under its inherent authority, sanction failure to comply with court orders ").
Accordingly, the hearing on the motion for summary judgment is continued to December 15, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
