Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Von Raesfeld v. Paige, 16-CV-06497-LHK. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161129e70 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE Re: Dkt. No. 4 LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . This case is an unlawful detainer action that was referred to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Judge Lloyd has made a report and recommendation that the District Judge grant Plaintiff's motion for remand because this action was improperly removed. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed and served on November 9, 2016. No objections have been filed, and the time to f
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING

CASE Re: Dkt. No. 4

This case is an unlawful detainer action that was referred to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Judge Lloyd has made a report and recommendation that the District Judge grant Plaintiff's motion for remand because this action was improperly removed. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed and served on November 9, 2016. No objections have been filed, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well-founded in fact and in law and, therefore, adopts the Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Santa Clara County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer