In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, 3:10-md-2143-RS (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161201g02
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs ("Florida") and Defendant TEAC, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to TEAC with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs ("Florida") and Defendant TEAC, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to TEAC with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights ..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs ("Florida") and Defendant TEAC, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to TEAC with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Florida against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation, nor shall it have any effect on any other claims, including under federal or Florida law, brought by litigants other than the State of Florida against TEAC.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the stipulating parties.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
