Filed: Dec. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. 3161 ET. SEQ RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Upon the parties' stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing on December 6, 2016, for defendant Kevin Hartig is hereby vacated, and the above-captioned matter shall be continued to January 17, 2017, at 2:30 p.m. for a change of plea, and that the time from December 6, 2016, through January 17,
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. 3161 ET. SEQ RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Upon the parties' stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing on December 6, 2016, for defendant Kevin Hartig is hereby vacated, and the above-captioned matter shall be continued to January 17, 2017, at 2:30 p.m. for a change of plea, and that the time from December 6, 2016, through January 17, 2..
More
STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 ET. SEQ
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Upon the parties' stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing on December 6, 2016, for defendant Kevin Hartig is hereby vacated, and the above-captioned matter shall be continued to January 17, 2017, at 2:30 p.m. for a change of plea, and that the time from December 6, 2016, through January 17, 2017 shall be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), and 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The Court finds that (A) the above-captioned matter is complex based upon the nature of the prosecution; (B) failure to grant the continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel and the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; and (C) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
