CONERLY v. SMITH, 16-cv-03168-MEJ (PR). (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161208952
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 21 MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . Good cause being shown, Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. Defendants must file and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion by January 31, 2017. Plaintiff's opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendants no later than 28 days fro
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 21 MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . Good cause being shown, Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. Defendants must file and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion by January 31, 2017. Plaintiff's opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendants no later than 28 days from..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Re: Dkt. No. 21
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
Good cause being shown, Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. Defendants must file and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion by January 31, 2017. Plaintiff's opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion.
This order terminates Docket No. 21.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
