DAUGHERTY v. SOLAR CITY CORP., C 16-05155 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161208953
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 16). While the motion remained pending, plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 20). Defendant asked to withdraw its motion to dismiss without prejudice to a new motion directed at the pleadings or a motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 26). Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to a new motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 16). While the motion remained pending, plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 20). Defendant asked to withdraw its motion to dismiss without prejudice to a new motion directed at the pleadings or a motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 26). Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to a new motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
