Cutlip v. Deutche Bank National Trust Company for the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust Pass-Through Certificates 2007-7, 15-cv-01345-BLF. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161221c50
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER DECLINING TO RELATE CASES [Re: ECF 69] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . On December 19, 2016, Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins issued a sua sponte judicial referral for the purpose of determining whether Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trustee Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-7148 is related to the above captioned case, Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trustee Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-4255, and Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-3612. ECF 69. While the parties are the same in the afore
Summary: ORDER DECLINING TO RELATE CASES [Re: ECF 69] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . On December 19, 2016, Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins issued a sua sponte judicial referral for the purpose of determining whether Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trustee Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-7148 is related to the above captioned case, Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trustee Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-4255, and Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-3612. ECF 69. While the parties are the same in the aforem..
More
ORDER DECLINING TO RELATE CASES
[Re: ECF 69]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
On December 19, 2016, Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins issued a sua sponte judicial referral for the purpose of determining whether Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trustee Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-7148 is related to the above captioned case, Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trustee Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-4255, and Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Cutlip, No. 16-cv-3612. ECF 69.
While the parties are the same in the aforementioned cases, Defendant did not attach a copy of the state court complaint to his notice of removal. See No. 16-cv-7184, ECF 1. Therefore, the Court is unable to determine whether it is "likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different Judges," as required for a determination of related case status. Civ. L.R. 3-12(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court DECLINES TO RELATE the cases WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
