Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Marlowe v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16-cv-00076-MMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161222998 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") on October 21, 2016; WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC ("Motion") on November 23, 2016; WHEREAS, based on Defendants' counsel's request, the Parties agreed, and this Court ordered, that Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion be mov
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") on October 21, 2016;

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC ("Motion") on November 23, 2016;

WHEREAS, based on Defendants' counsel's request, the Parties agreed, and this Court ordered, that Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion be moved to December 21, 2016 and Defendants' deadline to reply be moved to December 30, 2016;

WHEREAS, an unexpected personal issue precluded Plaintiff's from working on Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion on December 20, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to allow Plaintiff a one day extension to respond, making Plaintiff's new deadline December 22, 2016;

WHEREAS, this one-day extension will have no effect on Defendant's deadline to Reply to Plaintiff's response, or on the hearing date on Defendant's Motion;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, and request that this Court order, that the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion be extended from December 21, 2016 to December 22, 2016.

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatories.

Dated: December 21, 2016. By: /s/Alexander S. Zalkin Alexander S. Zalkin Attorney for Plaintiff HEATHER MARLOWE

PROPOSED ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff's new deadline to respond to Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is December 22, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer