Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 07-cv-5944 (JST) (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161223a09
Filed: Dec. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO TECHNICOLOR AND TDA DEFENDANTS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. All claims asserted by Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. against Defendants Technicolor SA (f/k/a Thomson SA), Technicolor USA, Inc., (f/k/a Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.) (collectively "Technicolor") and Technologies Displays Americas L
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO TECHNICOLOR AND TDA DEFENDANTS

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:

1. All claims asserted by Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. against Defendants Technicolor SA (f/k/a Thomson SA), Technicolor USA, Inc., (f/k/a Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.) (collectively "Technicolor") and Technologies Displays Americas LLC (f/k/a Thomson Displays Americas LLC) ("TDA") are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

3. This Order is not a dismissal of any person or entity other than the Technicolor and TDA Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer