HICKS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., 3:16-CV-06363-WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161227945
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Carrie Hicks ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony"), pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate that Synchrony has an extension of time, until January 5, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff and Synchrony further stipulate that if Synchrony files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, Plaintiff has an additional fourteen days, beyond the stan
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Carrie Hicks ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony"), pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate that Synchrony has an extension of time, until January 5, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff and Synchrony further stipulate that if Synchrony files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, Plaintiff has an additional fourteen days, beyond the stand..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carrie Hicks ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony"), pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate that Synchrony has an extension of time, until January 5, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff and Synchrony further stipulate that if Synchrony files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, Plaintiff has an additional fourteen days, beyond the standard response time, to file a response to that Motion to Dismiss.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
