Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Melcher v. Richardson, C 13-04930 WHA (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161229958 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Debtor Jacqueline Melcher filed multiple appeals in connection with her bankruptcy (3:16-cv-05851-WHA, 3:16-cv-05852-WHA, 3:16-cv-05853-WHA, 3:16-cv-05982-WHA, and 3:16-cv-06123-WHA). In yet another action (3:13-cv-04930-WHA), the Trustee's motion for sanctions against debtor is pending. These matters were reassigned to the undersigned following Judge Ronald Whyte's retirement. Following debtor
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS

Debtor Jacqueline Melcher filed multiple appeals in connection with her bankruptcy (3:16-cv-05851-WHA, 3:16-cv-05852-WHA, 3:16-cv-05853-WHA, 3:16-cv-05982-WHA, and 3:16-cv-06123-WHA). In yet another action (3:13-cv-04930-WHA), the Trustee's motion for sanctions against debtor is pending. These matters were reassigned to the undersigned following Judge Ronald Whyte's retirement. Following debtor's motion and the Trustee's consent thereto, the Court previously consolidated appeals 16-5851, 16-5852, and 16-5853, with 16-5851 as the lead case for all subsequent filings.

Debtor has now filed a new motion to consolidate. Her motion lists three matters — 16-5982, 16-6123, and 13-4930 — on its cover page, but is "not certain which case numbers belong to which fee appeal" (16-5982, Dkt. No. 6 at 5). The motion apparently seeks to combine her appeals from the bankruptcy court's September 26 and September 30 orders (id. at 1). These would correspond to appeals 16-5982 and 16-6123, respectively. And, although it is unclear, the motion also seems to request consolidation of 13-4930 on the basis that "the Trustee and his attorney's fees are entwined with the Sanctions Case [and] his attorney's fees and expenses have been appealed which included the Bankruptcy Court's September 30, 2016 on [sic] ruling on sanctions" (id. at 4).

The Trustee does not oppose the consolidation of appeals 16-5982 and 16-6123 (16-5982, Dkt. No. 7 at 1). He does, however, oppose the motion as to 13-4930, which remains active because of the Trustee's motion for sanctions against debtor. Debtor failed to timely respond to the Trustee's opposition by December 23.

Debtor's motion is GRANTED IN PART. Pursuant to FRCP 42, the appeals numbered 16-5982 and 16-6123 are CONSOLIDATED. 16-5982 shall be the LEAD CASE. 16-6123 is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. All subsequent filings in this matter must be made in the lead case only. Debtor's motion to consolidate is DENIED as to 13-4930.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer