DALLIN LLC v. IIGA, 16-cv-06407-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170104689
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND REMANDING TO STATE COURT Docket No. 8, 9, 12 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Dallin, LLC initiated this unlawful detainer action in state court against Defendants Josephine Iiga, Leonard Parham, and Susan Robinson. Defendants, proceeding pro se, subsequently removed the case to federal court. Judge Corley of this Court issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") in which she concluded that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking over
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND REMANDING TO STATE COURT Docket No. 8, 9, 12 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Dallin, LLC initiated this unlawful detainer action in state court against Defendants Josephine Iiga, Leonard Parham, and Susan Robinson. Defendants, proceeding pro se, subsequently removed the case to federal court. Judge Corley of this Court issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") in which she concluded that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking over ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND REMANDING TO STATE COURT
Docket No. 8, 9, 12
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dallin, LLC initiated this unlawful detainer action in state court against Defendants Josephine Iiga, Leonard Parham, and Susan Robinson. Defendants, proceeding pro se, subsequently removed the case to federal court. Judge Corley of this Court issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") in which she concluded that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking over the case. The R&R was served on Defendants but they did not file any objections.
The Court has reviewed Judge Corley's R&R and finds it thorough, well reasoned, and correct. Accordingly, it ADOPTS Judge Corley's R&R as the order of the Court. This action is REMANDED to the state court for further proceedings.
Dallin's motion to remand and motion to shorten time are deemed MOOT in light of this order.
The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close the file in this case.
This order disposes of Docket Nos. 8, 9, and 12.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
