Fountain Inc. v. Paralenz Inc., 3:16-CV-5831-CRB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170105796
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the entire action. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in both the present action and in the related previous action in this District between Plaintiff Fountain Inc. and Defendant Paralenz ApS (then doing business as Octo
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the entire action. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in both the present action and in the related previous action in this District between Plaintiff Fountain Inc. and Defendant Paralenz ApS (then doing business as Octos..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the entire action. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in both the present action and in the related previous action in this District between Plaintiff Fountain Inc. and Defendant Paralenz ApS (then doing business as Octospot ApS) of Fountain Inc. vs. Octospot ApS, Case No. 4:16-CV-04473-KAW.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of dismissal, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
1. The present action is dismissed with prejudice.
2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in both the present action and in the related previous action in this District between Plaintiff Fountain Inc. and Defendant Paralenz ApS (then doing business as Octospot ApS) of Fountain Inc. vs. Octospot ApS, Case No. 4:16-CV-04473-KAW.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
