RANA v. YOUXIN GU, 3:16-cv-5589-WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170110657
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Therefore, the parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action in its entirety, with the Court to retain jurisdiction over this matter with regards to enforcing the terms of the settlement. So stipulated. ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Nadia Aziz, attest that concurrence in the filing of this documen
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Therefore, the parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action in its entirety, with the Court to retain jurisdiction over this matter with regards to enforcing the terms of the settlement. So stipulated. ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Nadia Aziz, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Therefore, the parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action in its entirety, with the Court to retain jurisdiction over this matter with regards to enforcing the terms of the settlement.
So stipulated.
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Nadia Aziz, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 5, 2017, at San Jose, California.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based upon the foregoing application and stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety with the Court to retain jurisdiction to with regards to enforcing the terms of the settlement.
Source: Leagle
