Filed: Jan. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Julian Metter ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 16, 2016, and served Uber with the Complaint on or about Novem
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Julian Metter ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 16, 2016, and served Uber with the Complaint on or about Novemb..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Julian Metter ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 16, 2016, and served Uber with the Complaint on or about November 17, 2016;
WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint, resulting in an extension up to and including January 9, 2017, and set the following briefing schedule (ECF No. 9):
• Plaintiff's opposition to Uber's responsive motion is due on or before February 1, 2017; and
• Uber's reply in support of its motion is due on or before February 15, 2017;
WHEREAS, Defendant filed an unopposed motion to relate in Cordas v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 4:16-cv-04065-RS (N.D. Cal. filed July 20, 2016) ("Cordas"), which was granted on December 16, 2016. Because the cases were related, Defendant intended to file a motion to stay this case pending resolution of Cordas in response to the Complaint, on January 9, 2017;
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2017, this Court heard Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Litigation in Cordas. Later that day, this Court granted Uber's motion, and stayed the case pending completion of the arbitration;
WHEREAS, now that the Court has granted Uber's motion to compel arbitration in Cordas, Defendant's intended motion to stay pending resolution of Cordas is moot;
WHEREAS, Uber now plans to file a motion to compel arbitration in this case. Without an extension of time to file the motion to compel arbitration, there is insufficient time to prepare a motion to compel arbitration in the time remaining before Uber's response is due;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint up to and including January 17, 2017;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule:
• Plaintiff's opposition to Uber's responsive motion is due on or before February 14, 2017;
• Uber's reply in support of its motion is due on or before February 28, 2017.
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AND STIPULATED that Uber's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended up to and including January 16, 2017; Plaintiff's opposition to any responsive motion filed by Uber is extended up to and including February 14, 2017, and Uber's reply in support of its motion is extended up to and including
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
