U.S. v. RUIZ, 16-CRY-1212-JUL. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170112918
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE DISCLOSURE JANIS L. SAMMARTINO , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the United States' Ex Parte Submission and Application for Order Directing Non-Disclosure of Certain Information (Van Ness Email). IT IS ORDERED that the information discussed in the redacted portion of the TECS record need not be disclosed to defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 87 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), 18 U.S.C. 3500, or Rule 16 of the Federal Rules
Summary: ORDER RE DISCLOSURE JANIS L. SAMMARTINO , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the United States' Ex Parte Submission and Application for Order Directing Non-Disclosure of Certain Information (Van Ness Email). IT IS ORDERED that the information discussed in the redacted portion of the TECS record need not be disclosed to defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 87 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), 18 U.S.C. 3500, or Rule 16 of the Federal Rules ..
More
ORDER RE DISCLOSURE
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the United States' Ex Parte Submission and Application for Order Directing Non-Disclosure of Certain Information (Van Ness Email).
IT IS ORDERED that the information discussed in the redacted portion of the TECS record need not be disclosed to defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), 18 U.S.C. § 3500, or Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Ex Parte Application shall be sealed until further court order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall not be sealed, and a copy shall be provided to defendant's counsel.
Source: Leagle
