ROBINSON v. THE CHEFS' WAREHOUSE, 3:15-cv-05421-RS (KAW). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170127m71
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2017
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Re: Dkt. No. 49 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On January 18, 2017, Defendant filed a motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 seeking various forms of relief for alleged misconduct by Plaintiff's counsel at deposition. As stated in the district court's January 19, 2017 order, the seriousness of the allegations and the relief sought "do not fall within the scope of `administrative'
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Re: Dkt. No. 49 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On January 18, 2017, Defendant filed a motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 seeking various forms of relief for alleged misconduct by Plaintiff's counsel at deposition. As stated in the district court's January 19, 2017 order, the seriousness of the allegations and the relief sought "do not fall within the scope of `administrative' m..
More
ORDER TERMINATING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Re: Dkt. No. 49
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On January 18, 2017, Defendant filed a motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 seeking various forms of relief for alleged misconduct by Plaintiff's counsel at deposition. As stated in the district court's January 19, 2017 order, the seriousness of the allegations and the relief sought "do not fall within the scope of `administrative' matters appropriately addressed under Rule 7-11." (Dkt. No. 54.)
Accordingly, the motion for administrative relief is TERMINATED, and Defendant is directed to file a motion for sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
