MEYER v. COLVIN, 3:16-cv-01894-RS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170127n09
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jan. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff Michael Thomas Meyer may have an extension until February 3, 2017 in which to file Plaintiff's Reply to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This is Plaintiff's third overall request for an extension in this case. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT I
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff Michael Thomas Meyer may have an extension until February 3, 2017 in which to file Plaintiff's Reply to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This is Plaintiff's third overall request for an extension in this case. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff Michael Thomas Meyer may have an extension until February 3, 2017 in which to file Plaintiff's Reply to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This is Plaintiff's third overall request for an extension in this case.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
