Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sonoma Horse Park v. Voltaire Design, USA, Inc., 3:16-CV-06475-EDL. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170127n20 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Sonoma Horse Park, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants, Voltaire Design, USA and Brice Goguet (collectively, "Defendants") hereby submit this stipulated request that the Court continue the current motion to dismiss for a brief period of time to allow the parties to continue their efforts to resolve this matter without the need for formal litigation. The attorneys for both parti
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Sonoma Horse Park, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants, Voltaire Design, USA and Brice Goguet (collectively, "Defendants") hereby submit this stipulated request that the Court continue the current motion to dismiss for a brief period of time to allow the parties to continue their efforts to resolve this matter without the need for formal litigation.

The attorneys for both parties have been meeting in good faith, and are committed to using their best efforts to settle the matter without further court intervention. The parties are incredibly close in settlement figures and believe this matter will be resolved informally. However, counsel for Defendants is currently in trial and expects to be in trial for at least two weeks.

The pending motion is set for February 7, 2017. The parties therefore request that the pending motion be continued for approximately six (6) weeks to March 21, 2017, with the response due on February 21, 2017, and reply due on February 28, 2017.

ATTESTATION

It is so stipulated.

I, Laura Seegal, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Counsel for Plaintiff, has concurred in this filing.

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Request to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and good cause being shown therefore, hereby continues the pending Motion to Dismiss from February 7, 2017, to March 21, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., in Department E, with responses to be filed by February 21, 2017, and reply to be filed by February 28, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer