AQUINO v. RASAVI, 3:16cv3167-WHO. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170202c32
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiff Jorge Aquino and Defendant Eric Razavi hereby stipulate that the Case Management Conference set for March 7, 2017, be continued ninety (90) days and request that the Court so order. This stipulation and request are made jointly based on the following: 1. The Case Management Conference is set for March 7, 2017 [Dkt. No. 15]. In advance of the conference, the parties are requir
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiff Jorge Aquino and Defendant Eric Razavi hereby stipulate that the Case Management Conference set for March 7, 2017, be continued ninety (90) days and request that the Court so order. This stipulation and request are made jointly based on the following: 1. The Case Management Conference is set for March 7, 2017 [Dkt. No. 15]. In advance of the conference, the parties are require..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jorge Aquino and Defendant Eric Razavi hereby stipulate that the Case Management Conference set for March 7, 2017, be continued ninety (90) days and request that the Court so order. This stipulation and request are made jointly based on the following:
1. The Case Management Conference is set for March 7, 2017 [Dkt. No. 15]. In advance of the conference, the parties are required, per rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Case Management Order dated December 13, 2016, to prepare and file a joint Case Management Conference Statement by February 27, 2017.
2. On January 5, 2017, the Court appointed Phillip Babich and Thuy Nguyen from Reed Smith LLP for the limited purpose of representing Plaintiff in the course of a settlement conference [Dkt. No. 18].
3. Plaintiff's counsel and defense counsel have engaged in a meet and confer discussion regarding a discovery plan and the case generally. The parties agree that more time is needed to prepare for a potential settlement, and that it would be premature to draft a joint Case Management Conference Statement until settlement talks have concluded.
4. Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate to and request that the Case Management Conference of March 7, 2017 be continued ninety (90) days and that all related Rule 26 obligations be stayed until the Court sets a new date for the Case Management Conference.
It is So Stipulated.
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 90 DAYS
Upon consideration of the stipulation and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) The Case Management Conference, currently set for March 7, 2017, be vacated.
(2) The Case Management Conference is continued to June 6, 2017.
(3) A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed no later than May 30, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
