COOPER v. THE PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC RETIREMENT PLAN, C 16-06355 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170202c39
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney David Levine (Dkt. No. 32) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the distr
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney David Levine (Dkt. No. 32) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the distri..
More
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The pro hac vice application of Attorney David Levine (Dkt. No. 32) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar" (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the state of bar membership — e.g., "the bar of New York" — is inadequate under the rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
