CARACAL ENTERPRISES LLC v. SURANYI, 16-cv-05073-RS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170202c55
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Both plaintiffs and defendants have filed motions to seal portions of their briefs and/or exhibits filed in connection with defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The portions of the filings sought to be sealed apparently contain information that former defendant PassportParking, Inc. claims as protected trade secrets. The motions will be granted only if, within 10 days of the issuance of this order, Pass
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Both plaintiffs and defendants have filed motions to seal portions of their briefs and/or exhibits filed in connection with defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The portions of the filings sought to be sealed apparently contain information that former defendant PassportParking, Inc. claims as protected trade secrets. The motions will be granted only if, within 10 days of the issuance of this order, Passp..
More
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Both plaintiffs and defendants have filed motions to seal portions of their briefs and/or exhibits filed in connection with defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The portions of the filings sought to be sealed apparently contain information that former defendant PassportParking, Inc. claims as protected trade secrets. The motions will be granted only if, within 10 days of the issuance of this order, PassportParking, Inc. comes forward and "articulate[s] . . . compelling reasons [for sealing] supported by specific factual findings . . . that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure" of court records. Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Upon receipt, the parties shall immediately serve this order upon PassportParking, Inc.'s counsel of record in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle