ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff William B. Look has filed a "Motion for Relief Under Rule 60 and Request for Leave to Amend" (dkt. 48), in which he asks the Court to vacate judgment and to allow him to amend his complaint. Look fails to identify the provision of Rule 60 upon which he bases his motion, but, as he is not claiming a clerical mistake under Rule 60(a), and as none of the other Rule 60(b) grounds for relief appear applicable, the Court will consider the motion under Rule 60(b)(6), "any other reason that justifies relief." "Only `extraordinary circumstances' may constitute an `other reason that justifies' reconsideration" under Rule 60(b)(6). See Totah v. Lucasfilm Entertainment Co. Ltd., No. C-09-4051 MMC, 2011 WL 723726, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011) (quoting Liljeberg v. Health Serv. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 864 & n.11 (1988)).

Look argues that there was no final judgment on the merits in state court, a prerequisite for res judicata. See Mot. at 2. But Look already made this argument, and the Court rejected it. See Order Granting Motions to Dismiss (dkt. 46) at 9-11. Even if Look is correct in his interpretation of the state proceedings, the Court's Order dismissing his Complaint was not based on res judicata alone. See id. at 11-14 (holding that judicial and quasi-judicial immunity bar Look's claims).

Look also complains that he was denied oral argument, "despite having made a record of intending to address the issue of waiver of sovereign immunity." Mot. at 2. But "[i]t is well-settled that there is no constitutional due process right to oral argument," see Sovereign Gen. Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Cas. Co., 359 F. App'x 705, 708 (9th Cir. 2009), and the Court's Order vacating the hearing cited to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), which provides that in a judge's discretion, "a motion may be determined without oral argument," see Order Taking Matter Under Submission (dkt. 45); Civ. L. R. 7-1(b). That Look filed a "Notice of Intent to Cite State Authority at Oral Argument" (dkt. 42), in which he asserted his plan to discuss eight cases that he, for no clear reason, did "not previously cite[] in any of [his] papers," id. at 1,1 including his thirty-seven page Opposition brief (dkt. 29),2 or his unauthorized "Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to State Bar Defendants' Rule 12(B) Motion" (dkt. 30), does not entitle him to oral argument.

Finally, Look argues that he should be given leave to amend to add additional defendants, asserting: "although the Order does not address municipal liability per se, instead of the State Bar[,] individual defendants responsible for the pattern and practice of blocking access to MPRE scores could be substituted." See Mot. at 3. This argument is not altogether clear. The Court's order did not address municipal liability because Look did not sue a municipality. See generally Compl. To the extent that Look seeks to add additional, unnamed defendants not identified in his original complaint, or this Motion, who created the Bar's alleged "pattern and practice of blocking access to MPRE scores," he bumps up against the Eleventh Amendment. See Hirsh v. Justices of the Sup. Ct. of Cal., 67 F.3d 708, 715 (9th Cir. 1995). To the extent that he seeks to impose on those individuals some kind of supervisory liability, it is hard to imagine how a supervisor could be liable for the very actions of his or her supervisees—the individuals who actually interacted with Look—that the Court already held do not create liability. See Corales v. Bennett, 567 F.3d 554, 570 (9th Cir. 2009) (no supervisor liability if no underlying constitutional violation); see also Order Granting Motions to Dismiss at 11-14. Because Look has failed to articulate a viable theory for suing additional defendants, the Court concludes that amendment would be futile. See Leadsinger, Inc. v. MBG Music Publishing, 512 F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir. 2008).3

Given the lack of extraordinary circumstances, see Totah, 2011 WL 723726, at *1, the Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.