James v. Comcast Corporation, 16-cv-02218-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170213509
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii)] EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff John C. James, individually, and defendants Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC d/b/a Xfinity, through the signatures of their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to dismiss plaintiff John C. James's individual claims with prejudice, in their entirety, incl
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii)] EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff John C. James, individually, and defendants Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC d/b/a Xfinity, through the signatures of their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to dismiss plaintiff John C. James's individual claims with prejudice, in their entirety, inclu..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii)]
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff John C. James, individually, and defendants Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC d/b/a Xfinity, through the signatures of their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to dismiss plaintiff John C. James's individual claims with prejudice, in their entirety, including all claims contained in the Complaint, and any potential affirmative defenses or counterclaims. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
