Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ORTEGA v. VILLAGOMEZ, 14-cv-03783-HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170224e81 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On December 8, 2016, the parties agreed to a settlement of this case following a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Vadas. Accordingly, the Court filed a Conditional Order of Dismissal on December 27, 2016. Dkt. No. 80. Although represented by counsel, Plaintiff then filed a purported pro se "Disapproval of Settlement Agreement and General Release" on February 14, 2017. Dkt. No. 81. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff's couns
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On December 8, 2016, the parties agreed to a settlement of this case following a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Vadas. Accordingly, the Court filed a Conditional Order of Dismissal on December 27, 2016. Dkt. No. 80. Although represented by counsel, Plaintiff then filed a purported pro se "Disapproval of Settlement Agreement and General Release" on February 14, 2017. Dkt. No. 81.

The Court ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to show cause why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to the settlement agreement. The Court further vacates the 60-day deadline to certify that the agreed consideration for the settlement was not delivered, set in the Conditional Order of Dismissal, to allow adequate time for counsel to respond. Counsel must file a statement of five pages or less by March 2, 2017, responding to this order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer