Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WARD, CR 16-485-JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170224e89 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the STATUS date of February 24, 2017 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar, be vacated and re-set for April 21, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. for MOTIONS HEARING. The parties also stipulate to the following briefing schedule: Motions: March 10; Opposition: March 24; Replies: April 7. The requested continuance is necessary
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the STATUS date of February 24, 2017 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar, be vacated and re-set for April 21, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. for MOTIONS HEARING. The parties also stipulate to the following briefing schedule: Motions: March 10; Opposition: March 24; Replies: April 7.

The requested continuance is necessary because the parties need to research, investigate and draft motions and responses in this matter. The requested continuance is sought under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties agree and stipulate that the time until April 21, 2017 should be excluded, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), because the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the bests interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The continuance is necessary to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts.

ORDER

Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the court hereby FINDS:

1. The ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance from February 24, 2017 until April 21, 2017 outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial because additional investigation, research, drafting and review are necessary to both parties' litigation of motions in this case.

2. Additional time is needed for effective preparation of counsel . Based on these findings, it is hereby

ORDERED that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(H) (7)(A) from February 24, 2017 until April 21, 2017. Further, it is

ORDERED that the STATUS date of February 24, 2017 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar, be vacated and re-set for April 21, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. for MOTIONS HEARING and that he parties adhere to the following briefing schedule: Motions: March 10; Opposition: March 24; Replies: April 7.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer