Filed: Feb. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ERIK K. BARDMAN TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants"); WHEREAS, on October 27, 2016, the Court entered an Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants' Motio
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ERIK K. BARDMAN TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants"); WHEREAS, on October 27, 2016, the Court entered an Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants' Motion..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ERIK K. BARDMAN TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants");
WHEREAS, on October 27, 2016, the Court entered an Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants' Motions To Dismiss (Dkt. No.34);
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 39), (now titled "Amended Complaint") (Dkt. Nos. 39 and 42);
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the Court entered an Order Denying Defendant Bardman's Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. 56);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Bardman have agreed that Defendant Bardman's time to answer the Amended Complaint may be extended as follows;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff and the attorneys for Defendant Bardman, as follows:
1. Defendant Bardman shall answer the Amended Complaint no later than March 8, 2017.
There has been one request for an extension of time previously made with respect to the Amended Complaint.
ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
