Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Maravilla v. Rosas Brothers Construction, Inc., 3:16-CV-06117 JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170302a73 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Civ, L.R. 7-12. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Civ. L.R. 7-12] STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The parties, through undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter was filed on October 24, 2017. 2. Defendant Rosas Brothers Construction, Inc. was served on January 13, 2017. The three individual defendants have not
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Civ, L.R. 7-12.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Civ. L.R. 7-12]

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The parties, through undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. This matter was filed on October 24, 2017.

2. Defendant Rosas Brothers Construction, Inc. was served on January 13, 2017. The three individual defendants have not yet been served.

3. This matter was assigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar effective January 20, 2017, following plaintiff's declination to consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes.

4. Counsel for defendants was first retained on February 9, 2017. The individual defendants will shortly acknowledge receipt of summons as requested by plaintiff's counsel on February 13, 2017.

5. Given the short amount of time between the appearance of defendants and their counsel, the parties respectfully, and jointly, submit that it would be difficult for defendants to engage meaningfully in meet and confer regarding the case, and prepare to exchange initial disclosures, prior to the March 8, 2107 case management conference previously scheduled in this matter.

6. In addition, defendants' counsel is on a previously scheduled vacation out of state that will not conclude until February 28, 2017, making it significantly inconvenient for defendants counsel to prepare for and meaningfully participate in the scheduled case management conference.

7. Accordingly, the parties respectfully, and jointly, request that the Court continue the case management previously set for March 8, 2017, to a date not less than 90 days thereafter.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. The Case Management Conference previously set for March 8, 2017, shall be continued to April 12, 2017 at 2pm and all related matters/deadlines shall be recomputed from this date.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer