VILLANUEVA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 17-cv-00582-VC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170310a78
Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 1 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . A case in state court may be removed "to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending." 28 U.S.C. 1441(a). The district embracing the Sacramento Superior Court is the Eastern District of California. The defendants are ordered to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the Eastern District of California or remanded to state court base
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 1 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . A case in state court may be removed "to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending." 28 U.S.C. 1441(a). The district embracing the Sacramento Superior Court is the Eastern District of California. The defendants are ordered to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the Eastern District of California or remanded to state court based..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 1
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
A case in state court may be removed "to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending." 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). The district embracing the Sacramento Superior Court is the Eastern District of California. The defendants are ordered to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the Eastern District of California or remanded to state court based on its removal to the improper district. The defendants shall file a response by March 15, 2017. The plaintiffs may file a reply by March 22, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
