Filed: Mar. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2017
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to the JURY VERDICTS of March 4, 2014 (Dkt. No. 551) and December 17, 2015 (Dkt. No. 918) and the ORDERS of the Court (including Dkt. Nos. 349, 350, 632, 678, 922, 986, 1009, 1020, and 1031 and any and all other orders of the Court that hereby merge into this judgment), the Court's FINAL JUDGMENT is as follows: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor Interna
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to the JURY VERDICTS of March 4, 2014 (Dkt. No. 551) and December 17, 2015 (Dkt. No. 918) and the ORDERS of the Court (including Dkt. Nos. 349, 350, 632, 678, 922, 986, 1009, 1020, and 1031 and any and all other orders of the Court that hereby merge into this judgment), the Court's FINAL JUDGMENT is as follows: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor Internat..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to the JURY VERDICTS of March 4, 2014 (Dkt. No. 551) and December 17, 2015 (Dkt. No. 918) and the ORDERS of the Court (including Dkt. Nos. 349, 350, 632, 678, 922, 986, 1009, 1020, and 1031 and any and all other orders of the Court that hereby merge into this judgment), the Court's FINAL JUDGMENT is as follows:
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively, "Fairchild") and against Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. ("Power Integrations") with respect to literal infringement of claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to direct infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and inducement of claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to the willful infringement of claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Fairchild and against Power Integrations with respect to enhancement of damages for infringement of claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to validity of claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to enforceability of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to literal infringement and inducement of claims 31, 34, 38, and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to the willful infringement of claims 31, 34, 38, and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Fairchild and against Power Integrations with respect to enhancement of damages for infringement of claims 31, 34, 38 and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to validity of claims 31, 34, 38, and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild, awarding reasonable royalty damages to Power Integrations in the amount of $139,800,000.00, plus an award of pre-judgment interest in the amount of $6,680,598.00, for a total damages award of $146,480,598.00;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to literal infringement of claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,747,977;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to direct infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and indirect infringement of claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,747,977;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Fairchild and against Power Integrations with respect to validity of claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,747,977;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to infringement of claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15, and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 8,179,700; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Power Integrations and against Fairchild with respect to whether a violation of Fairchild's Seventh Amendment rights occurred.
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
